Filipina threesome streams

So? L Ron Hubbard was a science fiction writer that started a movement after modern science existed and people still bought into it. People believing shit doesn't make it true.

My mother used to tell me "son, if its too good to be true, it isn't"

because macro is different than micro? lol

ok that's fine. Although I find it valuable to discuss proposed laws before they are passed. Otherwise we end up with bad laws.

Constantine, who was a pagan, helps Christians gain acceptability and power. The power of access to control of the secular power of the state. And their vision becomes to rule the world instead of replacing it with the kingdom of God, where righteousness and true justice rule.

?Why are you asking just about America? ?

Clearly, it is safe to assume you are adept at

I do not understand it, no; and please refrain from being a prick when someone asks you a question.

Neither churches nor religious persons should be tax exempt.

Both events are related to cooler-than-normal water temperatures in the Pacific Ocean.

We've see a chain of female comics suffer consequences for saying things that men get away with saying everyday. They can't claim to have the moral upper hand when they defend the words that come out of the President's own mouth about women. But again, this isn't really about showing greater respect for women. This is about using women..no matter who the woman is..for political points.

Oh. If they give money to charity or for charity, that would be tax exempt just like it is for anyone, so I don?t know why you?d raise that point. But why should money used for the church be tax exempt? If I give money to charity for a tax write off, I?m still open for an audit. Why shouldn?t a church be the same way? I?ve never heard anyone give a substantive reason that religious money should be tax free with closed books. Nowhere is that in the founding documents. As I demonstrated above, frankly, it?s unconstitutional.

One other thing. Once you have tossed this chump into the metaphorical wood chipper of love, Stay away from dudes for a little bit. Take a minute to think through what would make a good partner for you. Then figure out where that kind of person would hang out, and go there. Helpful hint, it's not in a club.

Why be mad at science? The religionists who don't support science just haven't moved with the times--the church has long since realised by learning the hard way not to get in the way of scientific development. Granted they use the developments to their advantage to propaganda their way through indoctrinating and attempting to "prove" they "knew all along", but they've at least stopped fighting science. Only the most fanatical old testament type of person (not refering to the bible, btw, just the term) would pretend science is wrong.

WHAT is Judaism?

No, I'm talking about Christian politicians, and legislation. You always seem to think it's all about social behavior, and getting along with each other. You never have anything to say that's actually relevant.

My mom always told me to keep ?mad money? on me in case I needed to take a cab somewhere or an idiot forgot their wallet when out for dinner.

That "teen kid" is a year older than I was when I joined the Navy.

I am doing what I can.

Being born gay is no more a sin than being born black, or left-handed.

The condition of pedophilia is not objectively immoral but acting on it is.

Apparently you don?t, FR. Even a grade 9 physics class could tell something cant come into existence by creating itself.

That?s silly. Your god does nothing. Just like all the other gods that you already know are not real.

YOU are the claimant. YOU have the burden of proof. If you can't meet it, which obviously you can't, you are a fraud. If you try to pass YOUR burden of proof on to me which you are now attempting, you are a cheat. Put up or shut up!

Trump is doing Putin's bidding and destroying western alliances.

Someone not a self-centered narcissist like yourself, apparently. Some people actually fight and die for principles that don't directly benefit themselves.

And here comes the line that I face everytime

A better way to say it is that God proves Himself. Science can neither add to, nor detract from, that self-evident metaphysical truth.

And I deeply disagree. They were definitely trying to make a religion-free government and let the nation's citizens have the freedom to worship Whomever they wanted in whatever way they wanted, or not at all.

In a digital age there need not be any leader. Everyone could speak for themselves.

If you are from Saudi Arabia, I would tell you do NOTHING that would get you in trouble. A man worth having, a man that actually cares will man up and make the online relationship an offline, legitimate one.

Well, I would disagree & would enjoy debating that. The donkey was prophesied, it

I've talked about such things with a friend, but I'd never, EVER do anything more than tell a couple of friends privately about something like this.

I wonder how many meds they gave the queen before her grandson royal prince Harry marrying an American actress. : )

Yes, I've heard many people assert there are atheist religions. I disagree.